Comments on: Walking with 1.5 http://coffee2code.com/archives/2005/01/06/walking-with-15/ pro-gram-mer: n. a person who converts coffee into code Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:35:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: kenny http://coffee2code.com/archives/2005/01/06/walking-with-15/comment-page-1/#comment-424 kenny Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:05:24 +0000 http://www.coffee2code.com/archives/2005/01/06/walking-with-15/#comment-424 If you have access to your DNS, you can fix this problem by adding an 'A Name' record for 'coffee2code.com' (no www's). I assume you only have an A Name record for 'www.coffee2code.com' - hence it only loading with the www's and not without. If you have access to your DNS, you can fix this problem by adding an ‘A Name’ record for ‘coffee2code.com’ (no www’s).
I assume you only have an A Name record for ‘www.coffee2code.com’ - hence it only loading with the www’s and not without.

]]> By: Scott http://coffee2code.com/archives/2005/01/06/walking-with-15/comment-page-1/#comment-421 Scott Wed, 19 Jan 2005 05:58:43 +0000 http://www.coffee2code.com/archives/2005/01/06/walking-with-15/#comment-421 Yeah, I have some domain name handling issues. Haven't looked into it much though. Thanks for pointing it out. As for the change I suggest in #10, it isn't using SWITCH() versus IF() that is my intent, it is that the code ALWAYS performs the 6 IF() checks, even though it will only ever match 1. That is why I also suggest that the IF()/ELSE IF() construct would be be better (that's what it's meant for!). Using SWITCH() is, to my mind, just as good. But more specifically, it is the same manner in which the devs handle an identical situation in <code>get_author_name()</code> so I suggested SWITCH() to maintain consistency. Yeah, I have some domain name handling issues. Haven’t looked into it much though. Thanks for pointing it out.

As for the change I suggest in #10, it isn’t using SWITCH() versus IF() that is my intent, it is that the code ALWAYS performs the 6 IF() checks, even though it will only ever match 1. That is why I also suggest that the IF()/ELSE IF() construct would be be better (that’s what it’s meant for!). Using SWITCH() is, to my mind, just as good. But more specifically, it is the same manner in which the devs handle an identical situation in get_author_name() so I suggested SWITCH() to maintain consistency.

]]> By: kenny http://coffee2code.com/archives/2005/01/06/walking-with-15/comment-page-1/#comment-420 kenny Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:55:43 +0000 http://www.coffee2code.com/archives/2005/01/06/walking-with-15/#comment-420 If you hadnt already noticed, I've link-backed to your site.. and for quite some time I was having difficulty accessing it. It seems that your domain only loads when the "www" portion of the domain is in the URI. http://coffee2code.com doesnt work. more info.. http://no-www.org Also.. on a related note about your WP code changes (#10); How are using Switches more effecient than multiple IF statements? From what I can tell, the more efficient code is the one with lesser lines of code. IF statements only have 7 lines of code whereas the switch statements have 20. Can you explain? If you hadnt already noticed, I’ve link-backed to your site.. and for quite some time I was having difficulty accessing it. It seems that your domain only loads when the “www” portion of the domain is in the URI. http://coffee2code.com doesnt work.
more info.. http://no-www.org

Also.. on a related note about your WP code changes (#10);
How are using Switches more effecient than multiple IF statements?
From what I can tell, the more efficient code is the one with lesser lines of code. IF statements only have 7 lines of code whereas the switch statements have 20. Can you explain?

]]>